Registered Practical Nurse (RPN) Practice Test

The process of weighing both evidence for and against an automatic thought to promote a balanced view is known as?

1. Evaluating thoughts

2. Modifying thoughts

3. Comparative reasoning

4. Reflective thinking

The correct answer is: Modifying thoughts

The process of weighing both evidence for and against an automatic thought to promote a balanced view is referred to as modifying thoughts. This technique is essential in cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), where individuals learn to identify and challenge their automatic thoughts that may be distorted or unhelpful. By actively engaging in this practice, individuals can explore the validity of their thoughts, consider alternative perspectives, and ultimately reshape their thinking patterns to foster a more balanced and realistic worldview. This approach encourages self-reflection and critical thinking, allowing for a more nuanced understanding of one's experiences and emotions. It can lead to healthier coping mechanisms and improved mental well-being, as individuals learn to manage their thoughts rather than be managed by them. In this context, evaluating thoughts and reflective thinking can be part of the process but are not specifically aimed at modifying thoughts in the way that this concept encompasses. Comparative reasoning typically involves drawing comparisons but does not specifically address the need to modify thoughts for balance. Thus, the most fitting term for this process is modifying thoughts.